Be informed. Be challenged. Be inspired.

Trump moves to toss January 6 obstruction charges, citing Supreme Court ruling

Washington DC, US
Reuters

Donald Trump on Thursday urged a federal judge to toss out two obstruction charges central to the case that the former US President illegally sought to overturn his 2020 election defeat, citing a recent US Supreme Court ruling raising the legal bar for those offences.

Lawyers for Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, argued in a court filing that the Supreme Court’s ruling requires US District Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss charges accusing Trump of corruptly obstructing an official proceeding – the congressional certification of his loss to Democrat Joe Biden on 6th January, 2021 – and conspiring to do so.


Pro-Trump protesters storm into the US Capitol during clashes with police, during a rally to contest the certification of the 2020 US presidential election results by the US Congress, in Washington, US, on 6th January, 2021. PICTURE: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton/File photo

Trump is also seeking the dismissal of the two other charges in the indictment on other grounds.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to a four-count indictment accusing him of a multi-part conspiracy to block the collection of votes and certification of his election defeat.

Trump’s argument is based on six-to-three Supreme Court decision in June, in which the justices sided with a criminal defendant charged under the same obstruction law who was accused of taking part in the 6th January riot at the US Capitol.

The court found that defendants charged under the law must have acted to impair “the availability or integrity” of documents or other records related to an official proceeding – or attempted to do so.



The indictment alleges that Trump attempted to disrupt the congressional session by creating fraudulent slates of presidential electors pledged to support him in battleground states he lost and then pressured then-Vice President Mike Pence to accept those pro-Trump electors when Pence presided over the certification.

Trump’s lawyers argued that prosecutors cannot show that Trump sought to impair evidence related to the election certification and cannot be held responsible for the conduct of rioters who delayed the congressional session.

The filing came a day after prosecutors provided a detailed account of their case against Trump as they argued it survives a separate U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.

Donate



sight plus logo

Sight+ is a new benefits program we’ve launched to reward people who have supported us with annual donations of $26 or more. To find out more about Sight+ and how you can support the work of Sight, head to our Sight+ page.

Musings

TAKE PART IN THE SIGHT READER SURVEY!

We’re interested to find out more about you, our readers, as we improve and expand our coverage and so we’re asking all of our readers to take this survey (it’ll only take a couple of minutes).

To take part in the survey, simply follow this link…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.